Modern Software Delivery Needs Orchestration, Not Just Tools

Every company uses Terraform, Kubernetes, and CI/CD. But needs humans to stitch them together

The Evolution

Software Delivery Has Evolved Beyond Deployment

What used to be Deployment is now Orchestration

Then: Simple Stack

Only 2 change types to manage

Infrastructure
Application Code
Now: Complex Change Management

30+ change types to orchestrate

Microservices - Architecture
ML Workflows - AI/ML
Policies - Governance
Schemas - Data
Secrets - Security
Configurations - Settings
APIs - Integration
Dashboards - Monitoring
Pipelines - CI/CD
IaC Templates - Infrastructure
Containers - Deployment
GitOps Configs - Operations

The Result?

Drifts

Out-of-order changes lead to Drift

TicketOps

Human Orchestrators and TicketOps

High Maintenance

New Tools & workloads

The Orchestration Gap

30+ tool categories that don't talk to each other

Without Orchestration

Illustration showing 9 disconnected tools including Git, Jenkins, Terraform and others, with manual integration scripts and inconsistent practices across teams
This illustration demonstrates the challenges of using 9 different tools without orchestration, showing how Git for Source Control, Jenkins for CI/CD, Terraform for IaC, Kubernetes for Container Orchestration, Datadog for Monitoring, Vault for Secrets, Helm for Package Manager, ArgoCD for GitOps, SonarQube for Code Quality remain disconnected and require manual coordination.
Manual integration scriptsInconsistent practices across teamsNo unified view or control

With Orchestration

Illustration showing Orchestrator connecting and coordinating all 9 tools through a unified orchestration layer, enabling Orchestrates all tools
This illustration shows how Orchestrator creates a unified control plane that coordinates Git (Source Control), Jenkins (CI/CD), Terraform (IaC), Kubernetes (Container Orchestration), Datadog (Monitoring), Vault (Secrets), Helm (Package Manager), ArgoCD (GitOps), SonarQube (Code Quality), enabling Orchestrates all tools.
Unified orchestration layerStandardized workflowsSingle control plane
Key Insight: The Tools were never designed to work together
Why Facets

Contract-Driven Infrastructure Orchestration

Sits between development teams and tool layer

👥

Development Teams

PlatformFrontendOpsBackendDataML/AI
Facets icon

Facets Orchestration Layer

Inner-sourced Automations
Organizational Context
Contract Enforcement
Policy as Code
🔧

Tool Layer

GitTerraformK8sJenkinsAWS/Azure/GCPMonitoring

Immediate Outcomes

100%
Standardization
80%
Fewer Tickets
10x
Faster provisioning
🚀
Northstar: AI X Platform Engineering
AI Terraform Authoring

Generate infrastructure code from requirements

Intelligent Debugging

Predictive analytics and recommendations

🔥 Soon
FinOps Agent

Autonomous cloud cost optimization

"We empowered teams with workflow ownership using Facets. Developer autonomy transformed our entire delivery process and everything clicked perfectly."
Kaushal Bagtharia
Kaushal Bagtharia

AVP, DevOps • MPL

MPL logo
STRATEGIC DECISION

Build vs Buy: The Orchestration Platform Choice

The strategic choice every engineering organization faces

Time to Value

12-18 months: Significant opportunity cost
1-2 months: Incremental and immediate value

Extensibility

Restrictive: Built for initial use-cases; hard to extend
Extensible: 30+ tools ready out of the box, extend with Terraform

Maintenance & Support

Hire experts: Competing with vendors for talent
Expert access: Access to specialists & rich partner ecosystem

Stability at Scale

Unproven at scale with risk factors
Proven: Battle-tested at enterprise scale

Product Roadmap

Reactive: As per Dev Tickets
Proactive: Feature launches every 15 days

Ready to Orchestrate Your Software Delivery?

Join 50+ enterprises that have transformed their SDLC with Facets orchestration